Address:
Click here to learn how to keep your data current and how to upgrade to a Citified Plus project profile.
Everything costs much more if the government builds it (or manages it).
It would cost much more if government built it.
I also do not want government building buildings.
But in the very rare exception where they partner with a private builder or developer to bring a project, let's have that project start and be planned from the ground up for purpose. Not offered into a program at completion.
If the governemnt gives no money, those apartments will still become occupied at the very least at market rents, after the bankruptcy pans out. So we are getting the housing one way or another.
Better that Geric and the banks gives up that $20M (or whatever the current shortfall is), than taxpayers.
The feds have money for projects that align with local housing goals.
This housing has now been created with no government money. It's ready.
Why add a bunch of government money now? Use the government money to spur a new build.
Q&A on US tariffs, declining housing starts and more with Edward Geric of Mike Geric Construction
Edward Geric updates us on his latest projects and dives into topical issues impacting...
179-unit Tresah condo tower in Victoria likely to complete as a rental due to rising costs, developer says
Construction costs have risen 30%, forcing a condo-to-rental pivot for the Speed Avenue project.
68-unit Tresah East completes in Victoria's 'Midtown' as 12-storey counterpart on-track for 2024 occupancy
First phase of Mike Geric Construction's Tresah development completed, with phase two targeted for next year.

